LINEBURG


<< . .

 22
( 23)



. . >>

273 K.
βI + (θ ’ 1) βi
G For the Stefan problem we assume that there is no expansion across
βi+1 = (23.20)
θ the front (i.e., [ρ] = 0), reducing the Rankine-Hugoniot jump conditions
according to equation (23.16). for mass and momentum to [VN ] = 0 and [p] = 0, respectively. Then
In multiple spatial dimensions, the equations are discretized in a equation (23.23) reduces to
dimension-by-dimension manner using the one-dimensional discretization
’ρS ([ho ] + [cp ] (TI ’ To )) = k T · N , (23.24)
outlined above independently on (βux )x , (βuy )y , and (βuz )z . Figure 23.1
shows a typical solution obtained in two spatial dimensions with a spatially
where ρ = ρu = ρr . Finally, the standard interface boundary condition of
varying β.
TI = To reduces this last equation to
The same techniques can be used to discretize the spatial terms in equa-
tion (23.8) or (23.10) to obtain symmetric linear systems of equations for ’ρS [ho ] = k T · N , (23.25)
the unknown temperatures Tin+1 . Again, the symmetry allows us to exploit
a number of fast solvers such as PCG. where [ho ] is calculated at the reaction temperature of TI = To .
The Stefan problem is generally solved in three steps. First, the interface
velocity is determined using equation (23.25). This is done by ¬rst com-
23.4 Stefan Problems puting TN = T · N in a band about the interface, and then extrapolating
these values across the interface (see equation (8.1)) so that both (TN )u
Stefan problems model interfaces across which an unreacted incompressible and (TN )r are de¬ned at every grid point in a band about the interface,
material is converted into a reacted incompressible material. The interface allowing the reaction speed S to be computed in a node-by-node fashion.
256 23. Heat Flow 23.4. Stefan Problems 257

Next, the level set method is used to evolve the interface to its new location.
Finally, the temperature is calculated in each subdomain using a Dirich-
let boundary condition on the temperature at the interface. This Dirichlet
boundary condition decouples the problem into two disjoint subproblems
that can each be solved separately using the techniques described earlier
in this chapter for the heat equation. For more details, see [44].
Figure 23.2 shows a sample calculation of an outwardly growing inter-
face in three spatial dimensions. Figure 23.3 shows two-dimensional results
obtained using anisotropic surface tension. The interface condition is the
fourfold anisotropy boundary condition
8
sin4 (2(θ ’ θ0 )) κ
T = ’0.001
3
with (left) θ0 = 0 and (right) θ0 = π/4. The shape of the crystal in the right
¬gure is that of the crystal in the left ¬gure rotated by π/4, demonstrating
that the arti¬cial grid anisotropy is negligible.




Figure 23.2. Stefan problem in three spatial dimensions. A supercooled material
in the exterior region promotes unstable growth.
258 23. Heat Flow




References



1 1



0.8 0.8



0.6 0.6



0.4 0.4



0.2 0.2



0 0



’0.2 ’0.2
[1] Adalsteinsson, D. and Sethian, J., The Fast Construction of Extension
Velocities in Level Set Methods, J. Comput. Phys. 148, 2“22 (1999).
’0.4 ’0.4



’0.6 ’0.6
[2] Adalsteinsson, D. and Sethian, J., A Fast Level Set Method for Propagating
Interfaces, J. Comput. Phys. 118, 269-277 (1995).
’0.8 ’0.8




[3] Aivazis, M., Goddard, W., Meiron, D., Ortiz, M., Pool, J., and Shepherd, J.,
’1 ’1
’1 ’0.8 ’0.6 ’0.4 ’0.2 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 ’1 ’0.8 ’0.6 ’0.4 ’0.2 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1


A Virtual Test Facility for Simulating the Dynamic Response of Materials,
Figure 23.3. Grid orientation e¬ects with anisotropic surface tension. Comput. in Sci. and Eng. 2, 42“53 (2000).
The interface condition is the fourfold anisotropy boundary condition
[4] Alouges, F., A New Algorithm for Computing Liquid Crystal Stable Con-
T = ’0.001 8 sin4 (2(θ ’ θ0 )) κ with (left) θ0 = 0 and (right) θ0 = π/4. The
3
¬gurations: The Harmonic Map Case, SIAM J. Num. Anal. 34, 1708“1726
shape of the crystal in the right ¬gure is that of the crystal in the left ¬gure
(1997).
rotated by π/4, demonstrating that the arti¬cial grid anisotropy is negligible.
[5] Alvarez, L., Guichard, F., Lions, P.-L., and Morel, J.-M., Axioms and Fun-
damental Equations of Image Processing, Arch. Rat. Mech. and Analys. 16,
200“257 (1993).
[6] Amenta, N. and Bern, M., Surface Reconstruction by Voronoi Filtering,
Discrete and Comput. Geometry 22, 481“504 (1999).
[7] Anderson, J., Computational Fluid Dynamics, McGraw Hill Inc. 1995.
[8] Anderson, D., Tannehill, J., and Pletcher, R., Computational Fluid
Mechanics and Heat Transfer, Hemisphere Publishing Corporation (1984).
[9] Aslam, T., A Level-Set Algorithm for Tracking Discontinuities in Hyperbolic
Conservation Laws, I. Scalar Equations, J. Comput. Phys. 167, 413“438
(2001).
[10] Atkins, P., Physical Chemistry, 5th edition, Freeman, (1994).
[11] Batchelor, G., An Introduction to Fluid Dynamics, Cambridge University
Press (1967).
260 References References 261

[12] Bardi, M. and Osher, S., The Nonconvex Multidimensional Riemann Prob- [28] Caselles, V., Kimmel, R., and Sapiro, G., Geodesic Active Contours, Int. J.
lem for Hamilton“Jacobi Equations, SIAM J. Math. Anal. 22, 344“351 Comput. Vision 22, 61“79 (1997).
(1991). [29] Caselles, V., Morel, J.-M., Sapiro, G., and Tannenbaum, A., eds., Special
[13] Bell, J., Colella, P., and Glaz, H., A Second Order Projection Method for Issue on Partial Di¬erential Equations and Geometry-Driven Di¬usion in
the Incompressible Navier“Stokes Equations, J. Comput. Phys. 85, 257“283 Image Processing and Analysis, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 7,
(1989). 269“473 (1998).
[14] Benson, D., Computational Methods in Lagrangian and Eulerian Hy- [30] Chan, T., Golub, G., and Mulet, P., A Nonlinear Primal“Dual Method
drocodes, Computer Methods in App. Mech. and Eng. 99, 235“394 for Total Variation Based Image Restoration, SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 15,
(1992). 892“915 (1994).
[15] Benson, D., A New Two-Dimensional Flux-Limited Shock Viscosity for Im- [31] Chan, T., Osher, S., and Shen, J., The Digital TV Filter and Nonlinear
pact Calculations, Computer Methods in App. Mech. and Eng. 93, 39“95 Denoising, IEEE Trans. on Image Processing 10, 231“241 (2001).
(1991). [32] Chan, T., Sandberg, B., and Vese, L., Active Contours without Edges for
[16] Bloomenthal, J., Bajaj, C., Blinn, J., Cani-Gascuel, M.-P., Rockwood, Vector-Valued Images, J. Visual Commun. and Image Rep. 11, 130“141
A., Wyvill, B., and Wyvill, G., Introduction to Implicit Surfaces, Morgan (2000).
Kaufmann Publishers Inc., San Francisco (1997). [33] Chan, T. and Vese, L., Active Contour and Segmentation Models using
[17] Boissonat, J. and Cazals, F., Smooth Shape Reconstruction via Natu- Geometric PDE™s for Medical Imaging, in “Geometric Methods in Bio-
ral Neighbor Interpolation of Distance Functions, ACM Symposium on Medical”, R. Malladi (editor), Mathematics and Visualization, Springer
Comput. Geometry (2000). (March 2002).
[18] Brackbill, J., Kothe, D., and Zemach, C., A Continuum Method for [34] Chan, T. and Vese, L., Active Contours without Edges, IEEE Trans. on
Modeling Surface Tension, J. Comput. Phys. 100, 335“354 (1992). Image Processing 10, 266“277 (2001).
[19] Brown, D., Cortez, R., and Minion, M., Accurate Projection Methods for the [35] Chan, T. and Vese, L., An Active Contour Model without Edges, “Scale-
Incompressible Navier“Stokes Equations, J. Comput. Phys. 168, 464“499 Space Theories in Computer Vision,” Lect. Notes in Comput. Sci. 1682,
(2001). 141“151 (1999).
[20] Bruckstein, A., On Shape from Shading, Comput. Vision Graphics Image [36] Chan, T. and Vese, L., Image Segmentation using Level Sets and the
Process. 44, 139“154 (1988). Piecewise-Constant Mumford“Shah Model, UCLA CAM Report 00“14
(2000).
[21] Burchard, P., Chen, S., Osher, S., and Zhao, H.-K., Level Set Systems
Report, 11/8/2000. [37] Chan, T. and Vese, L., A Level Set Algorithm for Minimizing the Mumford“
Shah Functional in Image Processing, in IEEE/Comput. Soc. Proc. of the
[22] Burchard, P., Cheng, L.-T., Merriman, B., and Osher, S., Motion of Curves
1st IEEE Workshop on “Variational and Level Set Methods in Computer
in Three Spatial Dimensions Using a Level Set Approach, J. Comput. Phys.
Vision”, 161“168 (2001).
170, 720“741 (2001).
[38] Chang, Y., Hou, T., Merriman, B., and Osher, S., A Level Set Formulation
[23] Caiden, R., Fedkiw, R., and Anderson, C., A Numerical Method for
of Eulerian Interface Capturing Methods for Incompressible Fluid Flows, J.
Two-Phase Flow Consisting of Separate Compressible and Incompressible
Comput. Phys. 124, 449“464 (1996).
Regions, J. Comput. Phys. 166, 1“27 (2001).
[39] Chen, S., Johnson, D., and Raad, P., Velocity Boundary Conditions for
[24] Caramana, E., Burton, D., Shashkov, M., and Whalen, P., The Construc-
the Simulation of Free Surface Fluid Flow, J. Comput. Phys. 116, 262“276
tion of Compatible Hydrodynamics Algorithms Utilizing Conservation of
(1995).
Total Energy, J. Comput. Phys. 146, 227“262 (1998).
[40] Chen, S., Johnson, D., Raad, P., and Fadda, D., The Surface Marker and
[25] Caramana, E., Rousculp, C., and Burton, D., A Compatible, Energy
Micro Cell Method, Int. J. for Num. Meth. in Fluids 25, 749“778 (1997).
and Symmetry Preserving Lagrangian Hydrodynamics Algorithm in Three-
Dimensional Cartesian Geometry, J. Comput. Phys. 157, 89“119 (2000). [41] Catte, F., Lions, P.-L., Morel, J.-M., and Coll, T., Image Selective Smooth-
ing and Edge Detection by Nonlinear Di¬usion, SIAM J. Num. Anal. 29,
[26] Carr, J., Beatson, R., Cherrie, J., Mitchell, T., Fright, W., McCallum,
182“193 (1992).
B., and Evans, T., Reconstruction and Representation of 3D Objects with
Radial Basis Functions, SIGGRAPH ™01, 67“76 (2001). [42] Chambolle, A. and Lions, P.“L., Image Recovery via Total Variation
Minimization and Related Problems, Numer. Math. 76, 167“188 (1997).
[27] Caselles, V., Catt´, F., Coll, T., and Dibos, F., A Geometric Model for
e
Active Contours in Image Processing, Numerische Mathematik 66, 1“31 [43] Chen, S., Merriman, B., Osher, S., and Smereka, P., A simple level set
(1993). method for solving Stefan problems, J. Comput. Phys. 135, 8“29 (1997).
262 References References 263

[44] Gibou, F., Fedkiw, R., Cheng, L.-T., and Kang, M., A Second Order [62] Fedkiw, R., Coupling an Eulerian Fluid Calculation to a Lagrangian Solid
Accurate Symmetric Discretization of the Poisson Equation on Irregular Calculation with the Ghost Fluid Method, J. Comput. Phys. 175, 200“224
Domains, J. Comput. Phys. V. 176, pp 1“23 (2002). (2002).
[45] Chern, I.-L. and Colella, P. A Conservative Front Tracking Method for [63] Fedkiw, R., Aslam, T., Merriman, B., and Osher, S., A Non-Oscillatory
Hyperbolic Conservation Laws, UCRL JC-97200 LLNL (1987). Eulerian Approach to Interfaces in Multimaterial Flows (The Ghost Fluid
Method), J. Comput. Phys. 152, 457“492 (1999).
[46] Chorin, A., A Numerical Method for Solving Incompressible Viscous Flow
Problems, J. Comput. Phys. 2, 12“26 (1967). [64] Fedkiw, R., Aslam, T., and Xu, S., The Ghost Fluid Method for De¬‚agration
and Detonation Discontinuities, J. Comput. Phys. 154, 393“427 (1999).
[47] Chorin, A., Numerical Solution of the Navier“Stokes Equations, Math.
Comp. 22, 745“762 (1968). [65] Fedkiw, R., Merriman, B., Donat, R. and Osher, S., The Penultimate
Scheme for Systems of Conservation Laws: Finite Di¬erence ENO with
[48] Chopp, D., Computing Minimal Surfaces via Level Set Curvature Flow, J.
Marquina™s Flux Splitting, Progress in Numerical Solutions of Partial
Comput. Phys. 106, 77“91 (1993).
Di¬erential Equations, Arcachon, France, edited by M. Hafez (July 1998).
[49] Chopp, D., Some Improvements of the Fast Marching Method, SIAM J. Sci.
[66] Fedkiw, R., Marquina, A., and Merriman, B., An Isobaric Fix for the Over-
Comput. 223, pp. 230“244 (2001).
heating Problem in Multimaterial Compressible Flows, J. Comput. Phys.
[50] Colella, P., Majda, A., and Roytburd, V., Theoretical and Numerical Struc- 148, 545“578 (1999).
ture for Reacting Shock Waves, SIAM J. Sci. Stat. Comput. 7, 1059“1080
[67] Fedkiw, R., Merriman, B., and Osher, S., E¬cient Characteristic Pro-
(1986).
jection in Upwind Di¬erence Schemes for Hyperbolic Systems (The
[51] Courant, R., Issacson, E., and Rees, M., On the Solution of Nonlinear Complementary Projection Method), J. Comput. Phys. 141, 22“36 (1998).
Hyperbolic Di¬erential Equations by Finite Di¬erences, Comm. Pure and
[68] Fedkiw, R., Merriman, B., and Osher, S., Numerical Methods for a Mix-
Applied Math 5, 243“255 (1952).
ture of Thermally Perfect and/or Calorically Perfect Gaseous Species with
[52] Crandall, M. and Lions, P.-L., Viscosity Solutions of Hamilton“Jacobi
Chemical Reactions, J. Comput. Phys. 132, 175“190 (1997).
Equations, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 277, 1“42 (1983).
[69] Fedkiw, R., Merriman, B., and Osher, S., Simpli¬ed Upwind Discretiza-
[53] Crandall, M. and Lions, P.-L., Two Approximations of Solutions of
tion of Systems of Hyperbolic Conservation Laws Containing Advection
Hamilton“Jacobi Equations, Math. Comput. 43, 1“19 (1984).
Equations, J. Comput. Phys. 157, 302“326 (2000).
[54] Davis, W., Equation of state for detonation products, Proceedings Eighth
[70] Fedkiw, R., Stam, J., and Jensen, H., Visual Simulation of Smoke, Siggraph
Symposium on Detonation, 785“795 (1985).
2001 Annual Conference, 23“30 (2001).
[55] Donat, R., and Marquina, A., Capturing Shock Re¬‚ections: An Improved
[71] Foster, N. and Fedkiw, R., Practical Animation of Liquids, Siggraph 2001
Flux Formula, J. Comput. Phys. 25, 42“58 (1996).
Annual Conference, 15“22 (2001).
[56] E, W. and Liu, J.-G., Finite Di¬erence Schemes for Incompressible Flows
[72] Glimm, J., Grove, J., Li, X., and Zhao, N., Simple front tracking,
in the Velocity-Impulse Density Formulation, J. Comput. Phys. 130, 67“76
Contemporary Math. 238, 133“149 (1999).
(1997).
[73] Glimm, J., Marchesin, D., and McBryan, O., Subgrid resolution of ¬‚uid
[57] E, W. and Wang, X.-P., Numerical Methods for the Landau“Lifshitz
discontinuities, II., J. Comput. Phys. 37, 336“354 (1980).
Equation, SIAM J. Num. Anal. 381, 1647“1665 (2000).
[74] Godunov, S.K., A Finite Di¬erence Method for the Computation of Discon-
[58] Edelsbrunner, H., Shape Reconstruction with Delaunay Complex, Proc.
tinuous Solutions of the Equations of Fluid Dynamics, Mat. Sb. 47, 357“393
of Latin ™98, Theoretical Informatics 1380, Lect. Notes in CS, 119“132,
(1959).
Springer-Verlag (1998).
[75] Golub, G. and Van Loan, C., Matrix Computations, The Johns Hopkins
[59] Engquist, B., Fatemi, E., and Osher, S., Numerical Solution of the High
University Press, Baltimore (1989).
Frequency Asymptotic Expansion of the Scalar Wave Equation, J. Comput.
[76] Greengard, L. and Rokhlin, V. A Fast Algorithm for Particle Simulations,
Phys. 120, 145“155 (1995).
J. Comput. Phys. 73, 325“348 (1987).
[60] Engquist, B., Runborg, O., and Tornberg, A.-K., High Frequency Wave
[77] Guichard, F. and Morel, J.-M., Image Iterative Smoothing and P.D.E™s,
Propagation by the Segment Projection Method, J. Comput. Phys (in press).
Notes de Cours du Centre Emile Borel, Institut Henri Poincar´ (1998).
e
[61] Enright, D., Fedkiw, R., Ferziger, J., and Mitchell, I., A Hybrid Particle
Level Set Method for Improved Interface Capturing, J. Comput. Phys. (in [78] Hancock, S., PISCES 2DELK Theoretical Manual, Physics International
press). (1985).
264 References References 265

[79] Harlow, F. and Welch, J., Numerical Calculation of Time-Dependent Vis- [97] Kimmel, R. and Bruckstein, A., Shape from Shading via Level Sets,
cous Incompressible Flow of Fluid with a Free Surface, The Physics of Fluids Technion (Israel) Computer Science Dept. Report, CIS #9209 (1992).
8, 2182“2189 (1965). [98] Kobbelt, L., Botsch, M., Schwanecke, U., and Seidal, H.-P., Feature Sen-
sitive Surface Extraction from Volume Data, SIGGRAPH 2001, 57“66
[80] Harten, A., High Resolution Schemes for Hypersonic Conservation Laws,
(2001).
J. Comput. Phys. 49, 357“393 (1983).
[99] Koep¬‚er, G., Lopez, C., and Morel, J.-M., A Multiscale Algorithm for Image
[81] Harten, A., Engquist, B., Osher, S., and Chakravarthy, S., Uniformly High-
Segmentation by Variational Method, SIAM J. Num. Anal. 31, 282“299
Order Accurate Essentially Non-Oscillatory Schemes III, J. Comput. Phys.
(1994).
71, 231“303 (1987).
[100] Kimmel, R. and Bruckstein, A., Shape O¬sets via Level Sets, Computer
[82] Heath, M., Scienti¬c Computing, The McGraw-Hill Companies Inc. (1997).
Aided Design 25, 154“162 (1993).
[83] Helenbrook, B. and Law, C., The Role of Landau“Darrieus Instability in
[101] Landau, L. and Lifshitz, E., Fluid Mechanics, Butterworth Heinemann
Large Scale Flows, Combustion and Flame 117, 155“169 (1999).
(1959).
[84] Helenbrook, B., Martinelli, L., and Law, C., A Numerical Method for
[102] LeVeque, R. and Li, Z., The Immersed Interface Method for Elliptic
Solving Incompressible Flow Problems with a Surface of Discontinuity, J.
Equations with Discontinuous Coe¬cients and Singular Sources, SIAM J.
Comput. Phys. 148, 366“396 (1999).
Numer. Anal. 31, 1019“1044 (1994).
[85] Helmsen, J., Puckett, E., Colella, P., and Dorr, M., Two New Methods for
[103] Li, Z. and Lai, M.-C., The Immersed Interface Method for the Navier“Stokes
Simulating Photolithography Development in 3D, Proc. SPIE 2726, 253“261
Equations with Singular Forces, J. Comput. Phys. 171, 822“842 (2001).
(1996).
[104] Lax, P. and Wendro¬, B., Systems of Conservation Laws, Comm. Pure
[86] Hirsch, C., Numerical Computation of Internal and External Flows, Volume
Appl. Math. 13, 217“237 (1960).
1: Fundamentals of Numerical Discretization, John Wiley and Sons Ltd.
[105] LeVeque, R., Numerical Methods for Conservation Laws, Birh¨user Verlag,
a
(1988).
Boston, 1992.
[87] Hirsch, C., Numerical Computation of Internal and External Flows, Volume
[106] Liu, X.-D., Fedkiw, R., and Kang, M., A Boundary Condition Capturing
2: Computational Methods for Inviscid and Viscous Flows, John Wiley and
Method for Poisson™s Equation on Irregular Domains, J. Comput. Phys.
Sons Ltd. (1990).
160, 151“178 (2000).
[88] Jiang, G.-S. and Peng, D., Weighted ENO Schemes for Hamilton Jacobi
[107] Liu, X.-D., Osher, S., and Chan, T., Weighted Essentially Non-Oscillatory
Equations, SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 21, 2126“2143 (2000).
Schemes, J. Comput. Phys. 126, 202“212 (1996).
[89] Jiang, G.-S. and Shu, C.-W., E¬cient Implementation of Weighted ENO
[108] Lorenson, W. and Cline, H., Marching Cubes: A High Resolution 3D Surface
Schemes, J. Comput. Phys. 126, 202“228 (1996).
Construction Algorithm, Computer Graphics 21, 163“169 (1987).
[90] Juric, D. and Tryggvason, G., Computations of Boiling Flows, Int. J.
[109] Malladi, R., Sethian, J., and Vemuri, B., A Topology Independent Shape
Multiphase Flow 24, 387“410 (1998).
Modeling Scheme, in Proc. SPIE Conf. Geom. Methods Comput. Vision II
[91] Kang, M., Fedkiw, R., and Liu, X.-D., A Boundary Condition Capturing 2031, 246“258 (1993).
Method for Multiphase Incompressible Flow, J. Sci. Comput. 15, 323“360 [110] Markstein, G., Nonsteady Flame Propagation, Pergamon Press, Oxford
(2000). (1964).
[92] Karni, S., Hybrid multi¬‚uid algorithms, SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 17, 1019“ [111] Marquina, A. and Osher, S., Explicit Algorithms for a New Time Depen-
1039 (1996). dent Model Based on Level Set Motion for Nonlinear Deblurring and Noise
Removal, SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 22, 387“405 (2000).
[93] Karni, S., Multicomponent Flow Calculations by a Consistent Primitive
Algorithm, J. Comput. Phys. 112, 31“43 (1994). [112] McMaster, W., Computer Codes for Fluid-Structure Interactions, Proc.
1984 Pressure Vessel and Piping Conference, San Antonio, TX, LLNL
[94] Kass, M., Witkin, A., and Terzopoulos, D., Snakes: Active Contour Models,
UCRL-89724 (1984).
Int. J. of Comp. Vision 1, 321“331 (1988).
[113] Meniko¬, R., Errors When Shock Waves Interact Due to Numerical Shock
[95] Kichenassamy, S., Kumar, A., Olver, P., Tannenbaum, A., Yezzi, A., Con-
Width, SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 15, 1227“1242 (1994).
formal Curvature Flows: From Phase Transitions to Active Vision, Archive
for Rational Mech. and Anal. 134, 275“301 (1996). [114] Merriman, B., Bence, J., and Osher, S., Motion of Multiple Junctions: A
Level Set Approach, J. Comput. Phys. 112, 334“363 (1994).
[96] Kim, J. and Moin, P., Application of a Fractional-Step Method to In-
compressible Navier“Stokes Equations, J. Comput. Phys. 59, 308“323 [115] Mulder, W., Osher, S., and Sethian, J., Computing Interface Motion in
(1985). Compressible Gas Dynamics, J. Comput. Phys. 100, 209“228 (1992).
266 References References 267

[116] Mulpuru, S. and Wilkin, G., Finite Di¬erence Calculations of Unsteady [134] Puckett, E., Almgren, A., Bell, J., Marcus, D., and Rider, W., A High
Premixed Flame“Flow Interactions, AIAA Journal 23, 103“109 (1985). Order Projection Method for Tracking Fluid Interfaces in Variable density
Incompressible ¬‚ows, J. Comput. Phys. 130, 269“282 (1997).
[117] Mumford, D. and Shah, J., Optimal Approximation by Piecewise Smooth
[135] Qian, J., Tryggvason, G., and Law, C., A Front Method for the Motion of
Functions and Associated Variational Problems, Comm. Pure Appl. Math.
Premixed Flames, J. Comput. Phys. 144, 52“69 (1998).
42, 577“685 (1989).
[136] Raad, P., Chen, S., and Johnson, D., The Introduction of Micro Cells to
[118] Nguyen, D., Fedkiw, R., and Jensen, H., Physically Based Modelling and
Treat Pressure in Free Surface Fluid Flow Problems, J. Fluids Eng. 117,
Animation of Fire SIGGRAPH (2002).
683“690 (1995).
[119] Nguyen, D., Fedkiw, R., and Kang, M., A Boundary Condition Capturing
[137] Rogers, D., An Introduction to NURBS, Morgan Kaufmann (2000).
Method for Incompressible Flame Discontinuities, J. Comput. Phys. 172,
71“98 (2001). [138] Rosen, J., The Gradient Projection Method for Nonlinear Programming,
Part II. Nonlinear Constraints, J. SIAM 9, 514“532 (1961).
[120] Nielsen, M., Johansen, P., Olsen, O., and Weickert, J., eds., Scale Space
Theories in Computer Vision, in Lecture Notes in Computer Science 1682, [139] Rouy, E. and Tourin, A., A Viscosity Solutions Approach to Shape-From-
Springer-Verlag, Berlin (1999). Shading, SIAM J. Num. Anal. 29, 867“884 (1992).
[121] Noh, W., CEL: A Time-Dependent, Two Space Dimensional, Coupled [140] Rudin, L., Images, Numerical Analysis of Singularities, and Shock Filters,
Eulerian“Lagrange Code, Methods in Comput. Phys. 3, Fundamental Ph.D. thesis, Comp. Sci. Dept., Caltech #5250:TR:87 (1987).
Methods in Hydrodynamics, 117“179, Academic Press, New York (1964).
[141] Rudin, L. and Osher, S., Total Variational Based Image Restoration with
[122] Noh, W., Errors for Calculations of Strong Shocks Using an Arti¬cial Free Local Constraints, in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Image Proc., Austin, TX,
Viscosity and an Arti¬cial Heat Flux, J. Comput. Phys. 72, 78“120 (1978). IEEE Press, Piscataway, NJ, 31“35 (1994).
[123] Osher, S., A Level Set Formulation for the Solution of the Dirichlet Problem [142] Rudin, L., Osher, S., and Fatemi, E., Nonlinear Total Variation Based
for Hamilton“Jacobi Equations, SIAM J. Math. Anal. 24, 1145“1152 (1993). Noise Removal Algorithms, Physica D 60, 259“268 (1992).
[124] Osher, S., Cheng, L.-T., Kang, M., Shim, H., and Tsai, Y.-H., Geometric [143] Russo, G. and Smereka, P., A Remark on Computing Distance Functions,
Optics in a Phase Space and Eulerian Framework, LSS Inc. #LS-01-01 J. Comput. Phys. 163, 51“67 (2000).
(2001), J. Comput. Phys. (in press). [144] Ruuth, S., Merriman, B., and Osher, S., A Fixed Grid Method for Capturing
the Motion of Self-Intersecting Interfaces and Related PDEs J. Comput.
[125] Osher, S. and Rudin, L., Feature-Oriented Image Processing Using Shock
Phys. 163, 1“21 (2000).
Filters, SIAM J. Num. Anal. 27, 919“940 (1990).
[145] Sapiro, G., Geometric Partial Di¬erential Equations and Image Analysis,
[126] Osher, S. and Sethian, J., Fronts Propagating with Curvature Dependent
Cambridge U. Press (2001).
Speed: Algorithms Based on Hamilton“Jacobi Formulations, J. Comput.
Phys. 79, 12“49 (1988). [146] Sethian, J., An Analysis of Flame Propagation, Ph.D. Thesis, University of
California at Berkeley (1982).
[127] Osher, S. and Shu, C.-W., High Order Essentially Non-Oscillatory Schemes
for Hamilton“Jacobi Equations, SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 28, 902“921 (1991). [147] Sethian, J., Curvature and the Evolution of Fronts, Comm. in Math. Phys.
101, 487“499 (1985).
[128] Peigl, L. and Tiller, W., The NURBS book, Berlin, Springer-Verlag, 2nd ed.
(1996). [148] Sethian, J., A Fast Marching Level Set Method for Monotonically Advancing
Fronts, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 93, 1591“1595 (1996).
[129] Pember, R., Bell, J., Colella, P., Crutch¬eld, W., and Welcome, M.,
An Adaptive Cartesian Grid Method for Unsteady Compressible Flow in [149] Sethian, J., Fast Marching Methods, SIAM Review 41, 199“235 (1999).
Irregular Regions, J. Comput. Phys. 120, 278“304 (1995).

<< . .

 22
( 23)



. . >>

Copyright Design by: Sunlight webdesign