LINEBURG


<< . .

 16
( 18)



. . >>

uncentralised societies) to the nation state. This approach is
justi¬ed by demonstrating the applicability of the same analyt-
ical models (game theory, the Prisoner™s Dilemma) to social
interaction in both simple and complex societies.
In this broader approach to civil society, no presumption is
made concerning the contribution that civil society makes to
coherence in the state, nor are some human societies treated
as ˜more evolved™ than others. Civil society may support or
undermine the unity of the nation state, depending on histor-
ical circumstances. Rationality is not seen as unique to social
action in market democracies. While it is entirely reasonable
to search for forms of civil society that promote co-operation
and order throughout the state, it is unhelpful to label those
that do not do so as ˜primordial™ or ˜irrational™. Their situ-
ational rationality must be investigated, even if the violence
they promote is condemned.
The narrow conceptualisation of civil society on which
Seligman (1992) and Gellner (1994) relied implies that tradi-
tional social institutions such as kinship and ethnic groups are
irrational and therefore followed blindly. Since allegiances to
kin or ethnic identities seemed intellectually inexplicable, the
only remedy appeared to be to introduce a universal market
Warfare, biology and culture 173
economy, dissolve traditional communities and thus infuse
behaviour with rationality. In practice, misguided implemen-
tation of the principles defended by Seligman and Gellner has
promoted social disorder rather than coherence. Failure to
understand the rationality of other forms of society makes it
harder to anticipate the consequences of social change. Pri-
vatisation of common land held by local communities has
enabled the rise of a landowning elite and, more importantly,
has destroyed the traditional local civil society. Local people
are dispossessed of productive resources and become vulner-
able to exploitation by potential patrons. We should rather
explore the rationality of allegiance to kin and ethnic commu-
nities in speci¬c social contexts.
Violence is not inevitable, not an uncontrollable genetic-
ally programmed trait inherited from the common ancestor
of humans and chimpanzees, but a response to particular con-
ditions in the ecology of society. The desire to promote order
is equally entrenched in our behaviour. The wider approach
advocated here makes it possible to understand why it is in
some people™s interests to promote a wider social order, but
in others™ interests to disrupt it. Socially disruptive actions are
sometimes, from the actor™s perspective, rational, and civil
war is not treated as an outbreak of irrationality, but as a rea-
soned response to particular social conditions. The aim of this
book has not been to defend violence but to explain the condi-
tions that compromise society and cause morally reprehensible
behaviour, as much as it has been to understand the origins of
social order. It has also sought to demonstrate that inter-ethnic
violence and feuding between kin groups in distant parts of
the world are precipitated by changes in the ecology of global
society, an ecology in which we also participate and which is
shaped by the policies of our own governments.
References



Ab´ l` s, M. 1991. Quiet days in Burgundy: a study in local politics, trans A.
ee
McDermott, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (French
edition 1989).
Abrahams, R. 1990. ˜Chaos and Kachin™, Anthropology Today, 6:
15“17.
Albrecht. 1937. Letter to Deputy Administrator Alice Springs, quoted
in Australian National Archives ¬le AA: CRS A659 40/1/1428,
˜Suggestions re Aboriginal Reserves in south-west of Northern
Territory, January 1935“May 1940™.
Alderdice, Lord. 2002. ˜Introduction™, in C. Covington, P. Williams,
J. Arundale and J. Knox (eds.), Terrorism and war: unconscious
dynamics of political violence, London: Karnac Books, pp. 1“16.
Allen, R. C. 1991. ˜The two English agricultural revolutions, 1459“
1850™, in B. M. S. Campbell and M. Overton (eds.), Land, labour
and livestock: historical studies in European agricultural production,
Manchester: Manchester University Press, pp. 236“54.
Amanor, K. S. 1999. ˜Global restructuring and land rights in Ghana™,
Research Report no. 108, Uppsala: Nordiska Afrikainstitutet.
American Anthropological Association. 2002. The El Dorado task force
report. http://www.aaanet.org/edtt/¬nal/preface.htm
Ardrey, R. 1967. The territorial imperative: a personal enquiry into the
animal origins of property and nations, London: Collins.
Ault, W. O. 1972. Open-¬eld farming in medieval England: a study of
village by-laws, London: Allen and Unwin.
Aureli, F., M. Cords and C. P. Van Schaik. 2002. ˜Con¬‚ict resolution
following aggression in gregarious animals: a predictive frame-
work™, Animal Behaviour, 64: 325“43.

174
References 175
Axelrod, R. 1990. The evolution of co-operation, Harmondsworth:
Penguin (¬rst published in 1984 by Basic Books, New York).
Bailey, F. G. 1969. Stratagems and spoils: a social anthropology of politics,
Oxford: Blackwell.
Banks, M. 1999. ˜Ethnicity and reports of the 1992“95 Bosnian con¬‚ict™,
in T. Allen and J. Seaton (eds.), The media of war, London: Zed
Books, pp. 147“61.
Barakat, S., C. Wilson, V. Simcic and M. Kojakovic. 2001. ˜Challenges
and dilemmas facing the reconstruction of war-damaged cultural
heritage: the case of Pocitelj, Bosnia-Herzegovina™, in R. Layton,
P. Stone and J. Thomas (eds.), Destruction and conservation of
cultural property, London: Routledge, pp. 168“81.
Barth, F. 1959. ˜Segmentary opposition and the theory of games™,
Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 89: 5“21.
1969. ˜Introduction™, in F. Barth (ed.), Ethnic groups and boundaries:
the social organization of culture difference, London: Allen and
Unwin, pp. 9“38.
Basalla, G. 1988. The evolution of technology, Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press.
Beattie, J. 1961. ˜Democratisation in Bunyoro™, Civilizations, 11.1: 8“
20, reprinted in J. Middleton (ed.), Black Africa today, London:
Macmillan, pp. 101“10 (page references are to the reprint).
Behar, R. 1986. Santa Mar´a del Monte: the presence of the past in a
±
Spanish village, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Benda-Beckmann, F. von. 1990. ˜Sago, law and food security on
Ambon™, in J. I. H. Bakker (ed.), The world food crisis: food secu-
rity in comparative perspective, Toronto: Canadian Scholars™ Press
Inc., pp. 157“99.
2001. ˜Between free riders and free raiders: property rights and soil
degradation in context™, in N. Heerink, H. van Keulen and M.
Kuiper (eds.), Economic policy analysis and sustainable land use:
recent advances in quantitative analysis for developing countries,
Heidelberg: Physica Verlag, pp. 293“316.
Benda-Beckmann, F. von and K. von Benda-Beckmann. 1999. ˜A
functional analysis of property rights, with special reference to
Indonesia™, in T. van Meijl and F. von Benda-Beckmann (eds.),
Land and natural resources in southeast Asia and Oceania, London:
Kegan Paul International, pp. 15“56.
References
176
Benda-Beckmann, K. von. 2004. ˜Law, violence and peace making on
the island of Ambon™, in M.-C. Foblets and T. von Trotha (eds.),
Healing the wounds: essays on the reconstruction of societies after
war, Oxford: Hart.
Berlin, I. 2002. Freedom and its betrayal: six enemies of human liberty,
London: Random House.
Besteman, C. 2003. ˜The Cold War and chaos in Somalia™, in R. B.
Ferguson(ed.),The state, identity and violence: political disintegra-
tion in the post-Cold War world, London: Routledge, pp. 285“99.
Biella, P. 2000. ˜Visual anthropology in the plague year: Tierney and
the Yanomam¨ ¬lms of Asch and Chagnon™, Anthropology News,
o
December: 5“6.
Blau, P. 1964. Exchange and power in social life, New York: Wiley.
Bloch, M. 1966. French rural history: an essay on its basic characteristics,
trans. J. Sondheimer, London: Routledge (French edition 1931).
Boas, F. 1888. ˜The central Eskimos™, Bureau of American Ethnology,
Annual Report, 6: 399“699.
1966. Kwakiutl ethnography, ed. H. Codere, Chicago: Chicago Uni-
versity Press.
Boehm, C. 1992. ˜Segmentary “warfare” and the management of
con¬‚ict:comparisonofEastAfricanchimpanzeesandpatrilineal“
patrilocal humans™, in A. H. Harcourt and F. B. M. de Waal (eds.),
Coalitions and alliances in humans and other animals, Oxford:
Oxford University Press, pp. 137“73.
Bohannan, L. 1958. ˜Political aspects of Tiv social organisation™, in
J. Middleton and D. Tait (eds.), Tribes without rulers, London:
Routledge, pp. 33“66.
Bourdieu, P. 1977. Outline of a theory of practice, trans. R. Nice,
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (French edition 1972).
Bowden, M. 1999. Black Hawk down, London: Bantam.
Boyd, R. and P. J. Richerson. 1985. Culture and the evolutionary process,
Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Brain, C. K. 1981. The hunters or the hunted? An introduction to African
cave taphonomy, Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Buchowski, M. 1996. ˜The shifting meanings of civil and civic society in
Poland™, in C. Hann and E. Dunn (eds.), Civil society: challenging
Western models, London: Routledge, pp. 79“98.
Burch, E. 1975. Eskimo kinsmen: changing family relationships in north-
west Alaska, New York: West.
References 177
Burrow, J. W. 1981. A liberal descent: Victorian historians and the English
past, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cam, H. M. 1962. Law-¬nders and law-makers in medieval England,
London: Methuen.
Campbell, J. K. 1964. Honour, family and patronage, London: Oxford
University Press.
Chagnon, N. 1967. ˜Yanomam¨ social organisation and warfare™, in M.
o
Fried, M. Harris and R. Murphy (eds.), War: the anthropology of
armed con¬‚ict and aggression, New York: Natural History Press,
pp. 109“59.
1968. Yanomam¨: the ¬erce people, New York: Holt, Rinehart and
o
Winston.
1979. ˜Mate competition, favouring close kin, and village ¬ssioning
among the Yanomam¨ Indians™, in N. Chagnon and W. Irons
o
(eds.), Evolutionary biology and human social behaviour, North
Scituate, Mass.: Duxbury, pp. 86“132.
1982. ˜Sociodemographic attributes of nepotism in tribal popu-
lations: man the rule breaker™, in King™s College Sociobiology
Group (eds.), Current problems in sociobiology, Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press, pp. 291“318.
1988. ˜Life histories, blood revenge and warfare in a tribal popula-
tion™, Science, 239: 985“92.
1997. Yanomam¨, ¬fth edn., Fort Worth: Harcourt Brace.
o
Chapman, B. 1953. Introduction to French local government, London:
Unwin.
Chibnall, A. C. 1965. Sherington: ¬efs and ¬elds of a Buckinghamshire
village, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Conway Morris, S. 1998. The crucible of creation: the Burgess Shale and
the rise of animals, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Cosmides, L., J. Tooby and J. Barkow. 1992. ˜Introduction: evolution-
ary psychology and conceptual integration™, in J. H. Barkow,
L. Cosmides and J. Tooby (eds.), The adapted mind: evolution-
ary psychology and the generation of culture, New York: Oxford
University Press, pp. 4“136.
Dart, R. 1925. ˜Australopithicus africanus: the man-ape of South Africa™,
Nature, 115: 195“9.
1959. Adventures with the missing link, London: Hamilton.
Davies, N. B. 1981. ˜Calling as an ownership convention on pied wagtail
territories™, Animal Behaviour, 29: 529“34.
References
178
Davies, N. B. and A. I. Houston. 1984. ˜Territory economics™, in J. R.
Krebs and N. B. Davies (eds.), Behavioural ecology: an evolution-
ary approach, Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 148“69.
Dawkins, R. 1976. The sel¬sh gene, Oxford: Oxford University
Press.
Day, T. E. 1916. Examination of the country west of the Overland
Telegraph Line, Northern Territory Bulletin no. 20, Depart-
ment of Homes and Territories, Melbourne (Australian National
Archives ¬le CRS A3, item 22/2391).
Declich, F. 2001. ˜“When silence makes history”: gender and memories
of war violence in Somalia™, in B. Schmidt and I. Schr¨ der (eds.),
o
Anthropology of violence and con¬‚ict, London: Routledge, pp. 161“
75.
Denich, B. 1994. ˜Dismembering Yugoslavia: nationalist ideologies
and the symbolic revival of genocide™, American Ethnologist, 21:
367“90.
2003. ˜The specter of super¬‚uity: genesis of schism in the disman-
tling of Yugoslavia™, in R. B. Ferguson (ed.), The state, identity
and violence: political disintegration in the post-Cold War world,
London: Routledge, pp. 177“98.
Doja, A. 1999. ˜Morphologie traditionelle de la soci´ t´ Albanaise™,
ee
Social Anthropology, 7: 421“38.
Duf¬eld, M. 1981. Maiurno: capitalism and rural life in Sudan, Sudan
Studies Series no. 5, London: Ithaca Press.
1994. ˜The political economy of internal war™, in J. Macrae and A.
Zwi (eds.), War and hunger, London: Zed Books, pp. 50“69.
2001. Global governance and the new wars: the merging of development
and security, London: Zed Books.
Dunbar, R. 1993. ˜Co-evolution of neocortical size, group size and
language in humans™, Behavioural and Brain Sciences Evolution,
16: 681“735.
Dunn, E. 1996. ˜Money, morality and modes of civil society among
American Mormons™, in C. Hann and E. Dunn (eds.), Civil
society: challenging Western models, London: Routledge, pp. 27“
49.
Durham, W. H. 1991. Co-evolution: genes, culture and human diversity,
Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Durkheim, E. 1938. The rules of sociological method, trans. S. A. Solovay
and J. H. Mueller, London: Macmillan (French edition 1901).
References 179
1952. Suicide: a study in sociology, trans. J. Spaulding and G. Simpson,
London: Routledge and Kegan Paul (French edition 1897).
Dyson-Hudson, R. and E. A. Smith. 1978. ˜Human territoriality: an
ecological assessment™, American Anthropologist, 80: 21“41.
Eames, E. 1990. ˜Navigating Nigerian bureaucracies™, in J. P. Spradley
and D. W. McCurdy (eds.), Conformity and con¬‚ict: readings in
cultural anthropology, 7th edn., Glenview, Ill.: Scott, Foresman,
pp. 38“47 (¬rst published 1985).
Eidson, J. and G. Milligan. 2003. ˜Cooperative entrepreneurs? Collec-
tivization and privatization of agriculture in two East German
regions™, in C. Hann and the ˜Property Relations™ Group (eds.),
The postsocialist agrarian question: property relations and the rural
condition, M¨ nster: LIT, pp. 47“92.
u
Elster, J. 1983. Explaining technical change, Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press.
Ember, C. R. and M. Ember. 1997. ˜Violence in the ethnographic
record: results of cross-cultural research on war and aggression™,
in D. L. Martin and D. W. Frayer (eds.), Troubled times: vio-
lence and warfare in the past, Amsterdam: Gordon and Breach,
pp. 1“20.
Epstein, A. L. 1958. Politics in an urban African community, Manchester:
Manchester University Press, for the Rhodes-Livingstone Insti-
tute.
Erasmus, C. J. 1956. ˜Culture, structure and process: the occurrence
and disappearance of reciprocal farm labour in Latin America™,
Southwestern Journal of Anthropology, 12: 444“69.
Evans-Pritchard, E. E. 1940. The Nuer, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Fabian, J. 1983. Time and the other, New York: Columbia University
Press.
Fairhead, J. 2000. ˜The con¬‚ict over natural and environmental
resources™, in F. Stewart, W. Nafziger and R. Vayryen (eds.),
War, hunger and displacement, vol. 1, Oxford: Oxford University
Press, pp. 147“78.
Fallers, L. 1956. Bantu bureaucracy, Cambridge: W. Heffer, for the East
African Institute of Social Research.
Ferguson, A. 1995. An essay on the history of civil society, Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press (¬rst published 1767).
Ferguson, R. B. 1995. Yanomami warfare, Santa Fe, N.M.: School of
American Research.
References
180
2003. ˜Introduction: violent con¬‚ict and the control of the state™,
in R. B. Ferguson (ed.), The state, identity and violence: political
disintegration in the post-Cold War world, London: Routledge,
pp. 1“58.
Fischer, M. 2001. ˜In the science zone: the Yamomami and the ¬ght
for representation™, Anthropology Today, 17.4: 9“14. Concluding
section in Anthropology Today, 17.5: 16“19.
Foucault, M. 1977. Discipline and punish: the birth of the prison, London:
Penguin.
Friedl, J. 1974. Kippel: a changing village in the Alps, New York: Holt,
Rinehart.
Gallagher, T. 1997. ˜My neighbour, my enemy: the manipulation of
ethnic identity and the origins and conduct of war in Yugoslavia™,
in D. Turton (ed.), War and ethnicity: global connections and local
violence, Rochester, N.Y.: University of Rochester Press, pp. 47“
75.
Gamble, C. 1998. ˜Palaeolithic society and the release from proximity:
a network approach to intimate relations™, World Archaeology, 29:
426“49.
Gar¬eld, V. and P. Wingert. 1966. The Tsimshian Indians and their arts,
Seattle: University of Washington Press.
Garwood, A. 2002. ˜The Holocaust and the power of powerlessness:
survivor guilt an unhealed wound™, in C. Covington, P. Williams,
J. Arundale and J. Knox (eds.), Terrorism and war: uncon-
scious dynamics of political violence, London: Karnac Books,
pp. 353“74.
Geertz, C. 1973a. ˜Thick description: towards an interpretive theory
of culture™, in C. Geertz, The interpretation of cultures, London:
Hutchinson, pp. 3“30.
1973b. ˜Deep play: notes on the Balinese cock ¬ght™, in C. Geertz,
The interpretation of cultures, London: Hutchinson, pp. 412“
53.
1973c. ˜The growth of culture and the evolution of mind™, in
C. Geertz, The interpretation of cultures, London: Hutchinson,
pp. 55“83.
Gellner, E. 1994. Conditions of liberty: civil society and its rivals,
Harmondsworth: Penguin (page references are to the 1996
edition).
References 181
Ghiglieri, M. P. 1984. The chimpanzees of Kibale Forest: a ¬eld study
of ecology and social structure, New York: Columbia University
Press.
Giddens, A. 1984. The constitution of society, Cambridge: Polity
Press.
Glazier, N. and D. P. Moynihan. 1979. ˜Why ethnicity?™ in D. R.
Colburn and G. E. Pozzatta (eds.), America and the new ethnicity,
Port Washington, N.Y.: National University/Kennikat Press,
pp. 29“42.
Glickman, M. 1971. ˜Kinship and credit among the Nuer™, Africa, 41:
306“19.
Goddard, C. 1987. A basic Pitjantjatjara/Yunkunytjatjara to English
dictionary, Alice Springs: Institute of Aboriginal Development.
Goldschmidt, W. 1979. ˜A general model for pastoral social sys-
tems™, in Equipe Ecologique (ed.), Pastoral production and society,
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 15“28.
Goodall, J. 1986. The chimpanzees of Gombe: principles of behaviour,
Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Goody, J. 1956. ˜A comparative approach to incest and adultery™, British
Journal of Sociology, 7: 286“305.
2001. ˜Civil society in an extra-European perspective ™, in S. Kavi-
raj and S. Khilnani (eds.), Civil society: history and perspectives,
Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp. 149“64.
Gouldner, A. 1980. ˜Civil society in capitalism and socialism™, in
A. Gouldner, The two Marxisms, London: Macmillan, pp. 355“
73.
Gournay, B., J. F. Kesler and J. Siwek-Pouydesseau. 1967. Adminis-
tration publique, Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
Grabher, G. and D. Stark. 1998. ˜Organizing diversity: evolutionary
theory, network analysis and post-socialism™, in J. Pickles and A.
Smith (eds.), Theorising transition: the political economy of post-
communist transformations, London: Routledge, pp. 54“75.
Gr¨ tz, T. 2002. Gold mining communities in northern Benin as semi-
a
autonomous social ¬elds, Haale/Saale: Max Planck Institute for
Social Anthropology, working paper no. 36.
Gunder Frank, A. 1971. Capitalism and underdevelopment in Latin
America: historical studies of Chile and Brazil, Harmondsworth:
Penguin.
References
182
Halbmayer, E. 2001. ˜Socio-cosmological contexts and forms of
violence: war, vendetta, duels and suicide among the Yukpa of
north-western Venezuela™, in B. Schmidt and I. Schr¨ der (eds.),
o
Anthropology of violence and con¬‚ict, London: Routledge, pp. 49“
75.
Hamilton, W. D. 1964. ˜The genetical evolution of social behaviour (I
and II)™, Journal of Theoretical Biology, 7: 1“52.
Hampson, N. 1963. A social history of the French Revolution, London:
Routledge.
Handelman, S. 1994. ˜The Russian ma¬ya™, Foreign Affairs, 73.2: 83“96.
Hann, C. M. 1990. ˜Second economy and civil society™, in C. M. Hann
(ed.), Market economy and civil society in Hungary, London: Frank
Cass, pp. 21“44.
2003. ˜Civil society: the sickness, not the cure?™ Social Evolution and
History, 2.2: 34“54.
Hardin, G. 1968. ˜The tragedy of the commons™, Science, 162: 1243“8.
Havinden, M. A. 1961. ˜Agricultural progress in open-¬eld Oxford-
shire™, Agricultural History Review, 9: 73“83.

<< . .

 16
( 18)



. . >>

Copyright Design by: Sunlight webdesign